
Author: Pete

Author: Pete

Author: mike morley
Jeff 31 May 2011 at 01:20 BST
Shocking indeed! See this month's issue (June/July) of Cycling - Q&A pages 50&51. And if that seat post fails?

Author: mike morley
Author: mike morley
Author: Jeff
mike morley 19 May 2011 at 00:53 BST
Dear All,
By observation of the results posted by Jeff I am most dissapointed that the CTC Home page gives scant details of the vote. The claim that the vote was overwhelming for the change rings rather hollow when less than one fifth of members voted on such an important change, much less than those that voted in the petition to "Save the CTC" I personally feel that it is unforgivable that the CTC did not allow full access to members to fully ventilate the "NO Vote" point of view. Members should have been given equal exposure for both points of view. I reject the idea that it is like saying the Government should allow all oposition parties the use of the government data base to put their points of view to all voters. This is a members club and not a political party system. I sincerely hope that this result will not start to split the CTC into breakaway groups but I fear that this result will not bring about the resounding success that CTC Council & Management hope for. We will see in the fullnes of time the effect this will have in terms of membership and the financial effect and impact on membership cost.
Author: mike morley